- Joined
- Feb 2026
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I've noticed that some answer explanations also have a "live" video which shows an instructor going through questions "live" -- don't think it's exacttly what youre looking for but somewhere to start.
@DamiOye Im coming to answer myself... the stim says NOTHING about employees quitting, ugh I literally inserted things into the stimulus that wasnt there!!!!! iljdijfoiherighjtrljtij :)
I may have reasoned myself out of E... but, just because you get paid more doesn't mean you can afford the homes? Feels like a stretch.
I chose D at first and then A on BR. Double wrong!!! But I chose those answers to attack the conclusion that folks would quit... if folks don't live within 30 min now then why would we assume that the move would trigger a move?
Would love help!
@daysdreaming thank you for your process. I struggled with the same thing and your articulation unlocked something for me :)
I feel for people of which english is not their native tongue because it is mine and I was STILL thrown for a LOOP with this vocab...adding spurious and putative to my flashcards.
@jaffri thank you!!!! Im testing tomorrow but aiming for my goal score for June. Good luck to you too!
Im taking it tomorrow... drilling this am for 1-2 hours and watching Legally Blonde & Scandal tonight ☺️
Why thank you!!!! I found that the analytics section was super helpful. So for me conditional reasoning was (and still is 😭) my highest priority so I re-did the core curriculum there and slowed down to digest and really take my time on the skill builders (I was breezing through it before, truthfully).
Then I did 5-8 drill sessions on just conditionals (show the answer right after, not at the end) and would actually watch the explanation videos (both if theres one from Kevin & JY), read the discussion for those questions too. Basically, I treated a wrong answer like something to understand versus just getting frustrated. I find talking to chatgpt about how I felt during the question and my approach/reasoning helped me diagnose issues and close the gap. I repeated that process for all the "highest" priorities... one week for conditionals, another for MBT, etc. And Im not afraid to spin the block and revisit the core curriculum for a 5th time. Get what you pay for!!!!
Speed will never improve accuracy but accuracy will improve speed. That mantra helps me slow down when I just want to rush and get over it.
TLDR; I got over myself and realized that I actually don't know the material as well as I think I do if under pressure Im getting them wrong. So I started treating myself like someone who didn't know the material and that has really helped me.
I would recommend picking one thing right now -- speed or accuracy. Its kind of like running... you can train for distance or speed but not both at the same time in the beginning.
And it seems like accuracy may be a better place for you to focus rather than speed (speed will come once accuracy improves). When I was seeing a big gap between BR and timed... I just stopped timing myself and slowed tf down to actually grasp the concepts and learn my blind spots (now I catch myself overthinking and snap out of it). I just had to meet my mind where it was at... instead of forcing it.
Ive gone from 146 on diagnostic to 161 in about 7 weeks. My goal score is 170+ so I have some ways to go but this is what has helped me so far. Good luck and be easy on yourself!
even my little picture was wrong... lol these are one of those that I'd need to skip or POE...
I just started in Feb too. Taking April + June -- its a marathon, not a sprint. Effort wont betray you!
Godspeed!!! You got this. Happy Lent, Ramadan Mubarak and Happy Lunar New Year <3
the key to this one for me is the nuance of being CITED as late and being late... those are two different things. And being late doesn't guarantee you will be CITED as late.
Im aiming for 170+ -- doing April to shake off nerves but goal is scoring in June. If you think you want to shake off nerves, I say do both if you can financially swing it!
@mperweb super helpful! I thought we were comparing 1 group to itself as well not to the other group. makes sense now.