@DarcyOvalles I think I got this question wrong because I read the conclusion as a conditional conclusion (no major alterations --> no complex reasoning), rather than separating the premise and the actual and finding the missing link (NA).

To me, it sounds like you are restating the argument in Q2, and then that is your answer. But I do not understand why.

The argument states: Incapable of making major alterations --> Incapable of complex reasoning

The answer is the contrapositive: Capable of complex reasoning --> capable of making major changes

That is the same statement.

I would like to join this study group, I am based in NYC, 22, and able to meet in person in Manhattan once a week, also scoring in 160, and would like to get 175+