I don't like this misleading claim in the 5th paragraph which says that if we had AN athlete(one) train in low oxygen then her results would prove something, as can clearly be seen in LSAT questions statistical fallacies such as improper sample size is tested and important on the LSAT. One athlete is not a proper sample size to test this hypothesis.

So how would the argument of "Most people who know how to play the violin are not exceptional. All violinists at the New York Philharmonic know how to play the violin. So, some violinists at the New York Philharmonic are not exceptional." work compared to the original argument?

Does it matter if the is in the kernel "Attempts will backfire" "The attempts will backfire"

Why can’t you assume that the goat method is not the only way to get a Genie+ pass? And wouldn’t you assume that the prostration does or doesn’t give you a Genie+ pass, since it isn’t stated whether that gives you a pass? I would assume these things on the test so I might be cooked