@lindsxmas @NadineShaan Agreed and Same...Delayed not Denied. I'm 31 and have had a crazy ride with LSAT since 2016. Also, I have gained valued work experience in the last 9 years. I graduated in 2016 and plan to take LSAT in 2026 once more test dates are released.

@Kevin Lin Ok, thank you so much! I think I have the logic down just need to practice this skill more.

@Kevin Lin If /Sleep -> /Perform well

@Kevin Lin If X(written) is not true unless Y(truth) is true. Therefore, truth is required for oral myths to be written down. If I am correct :(, I think I am struggling to grasp which part of the statement is necessary in relation to the other part of the statement in the sentence. Thoughts?

#help For Q.4 my initial logic translation was the contrapositive /RSVP -> /I because I interpreter as the invite (I) as the negate necessary. Subsequently, Rudy affirmed the sufficient which triggers the necessary condition (/I). Is this the correct approach? I am confused.

#help # confused I am confused about why the statement following unless (negate, sufficient) in the necessary condition. When I did the exercise, I focused on the unless but placed this statement in the sufficient part of the condition and negated it.