Disney is the strongest due to the premises having necessary conditions for the conclusion to follow logically. If Walt does not prostrate before goofy's altar or offer the goats, there is literally no way you can have the Genie+ pass.

The tiger argument is mid strength because it makes a broad generalization based off of one premise that does not cast a very wide net. The conclusion states, not every mammal is suitable to keep as a pet. tigers are dangerous so that alone shows why every mammal is not suitable. Someone could attack this by saying, well sure tigers are dangerous, but that does not explain WHY every mammal is not suitable to have as a pet. Size could be a factor, a certain allergen that a species may carry against common home cleaning products. There could be so many more reason to why an animal isn't suitable as a pet that has nothing to do with the temperament of an animal.

The trash bin argument is the weakest, because there are so many "what if" possibilities in this whole argument. What if a robber broke in and toppled the trash bin? What if, the cat is on the counter because when the robber left, he left the door open and a raccoon came in and startled the cat? What if that same raccoon ate the salmon? What if the cat's treats are left on the counter, and while he was hiding from the raccoon, he accessed his bag of treats and thats why he's licking his face in self satisfaction? I Did not challenge the truth of any of the premises, there are just large gaps in terms of how the premises connect to the conclusion.

1 + 1 = 2. Therefore, two is always better than one.

Just for fun, maybe try and take a stab at what is wrong with this argument.

@KC_AllIn I wanna say that a phenomenon can happen independently. A hypothesis is simply an observation of said phenomenon, So I would assume that the phenomenon activates the hypothesis.

here roughly 11 months before test day. I am about a month in current personal best is a 152 aiming for a 170. Best of luck everyone