For question 1, I had an error based on the wording in the two premises. In P1, it says "electric trucks," and in P2, it says "trucks," which I infer as any kind. In the conclusion/explanation, it says this info is irrelevant, but I would examine trucks and electric trucks as inequivalent since one is a subset of the other. Maybe I am just confused. Can anyone explain why it is irrelevant to pay attention to the word "electric"?

@sarah.hasan373 As I'm working through the passage, I sorta choose to ignore the jargon I don't understand and instead focus on what I can. If they're talking about info specific to indigenous culture and western vid technology, I obviously won't know much of what they're saying since I'm unqualified. i can however identify key words that point to what the author / differing viewpoints want us to know. Its like finding a needle in a haystack for I guess.