- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Sorry but this answer choice makes no sense....A is illogical because it is implying the company subcontracting, has control of the subcontractor
Do you know how many times there are similar questions with similar answers and when I pick an answer like A, the explanation given is "we're not talking about that". This question can just go to hell
What tripped me up about B was the "more than a few pages in length." This felt like a limiter to me. If people preferred to read on paper, who cares if it's a page long? They'll still want to read it on a page and not a screen.
I don't follow the answer to this question at all.
"takes for granted that when something is present, when something else occurs, that something is the reason that something occurred"...that's how I'm taking it....
But I am taking the argument to say that tears have hormone that are produced when stressed. Crying removes these hormones. So crying reduces stress.
This is easy to follow...but would the answer not make more sense if it said "takes for granted that because substances are present whenever a condition occurs, that condition has an effect on those substances"
I do not see anywhere that says stress makes you cry or vice versa.
Add me in please!
L o......FUCKING L if anyone here is like me, they will whittle it down to C & E...and if you picked C...and realize why it is wrong....well you can't help but laugh.
Analytics seem wrong for anyone else?
Can someone help me explain how Lydia is closing herself off to alternative explanations? Here conclusion says" "probably after the sugar". Not "is after".
Hi,, also interested.. Im in the Winter Park area
How can C be the answer when it looks like it is addressing one thing?
How can C be the answer when C looks like it is addressing one thing?
when it came to analytics from the old website, I really enjoyed the line graph we used to have. I think having analytics from your PTs and drills combined, with the option of using one pool, or the other or both to get a gauge of where you stand in that moment in time
This question, while getting it right, I found it difficult to answer
Am I the only one who thinks the explanation to C doesn't make sense and perhaps even wrong? Argument is talking about the results of a survey that came from a group of people and then results are applied to "most citizens". Yet the explanation at least to me, is circular. I'm reading it as the results from a group, don't apply to the group...but we're talking about results from a group applied to "most citizens"