Hi, I am looking for advice for how to get into the high 160s and lower 170s by November test. My last PTs are averaging 164 with LR averaging -4 and RC averaging -6. I do full PT BRs and WAJs and have read the loophole. Looking for any advice! Thanks!
I picked E and was honestly pretty confident but realized why its wrong: my logic which led to my conclusion was that E implied that it would reduce car driving retail purchases, but my logic requires assuming that most of these ppl didn’t actually drive their car to say, order pickup or see the product first or try it on. Also, E says that ppl bought as a RESULT of DMA not that they bought through DMA.
did anyone not pick B because of the wording in B being too strong? I thought moral considerations should be given SIGNIFICANT weight was too strong, so I picked E instead. I picked E because I thought some of the prudent reasons to oppose judicial sincerity was how judges need to balance other obligations.