Is a "similar structure" different from the "parallel method of reasoning?"

How does the 33% suggest below average quality? I see how the conclusion descriptor matches but can't see how the premise matches in AC C.

Can someone please explain how the conditional would look like if the "without" negate sufficient was used for the first part of AC B?

The Explanation shows /LL2 -> /P

However, what about you want to use the negate sufficient for the "it is not possible?

Will it be + P-> LL2 ...in that case, how can we still see that it has the same flaw? Do we need to negate it to see the flaw and how do we determine that it needs to be negated.

I understand how it works when the negate sufficient is used on the "fluent in at least two" but I don't understand when it's used in the "it's not possible"

Can someone still show me how we can still get to the same conclusion?

Can someone please give me an example of a direct counterexample?

How is the gap compromise-> benefit?

What does a binary cut mean? I'm kinda confused how it's not contraposed and linked.

Can I apply for FAFSA before submitting my applications to law schools?

what does the "apt" mean in the context of D?

In a timed situation, should we map out Lawgic the first time we read the stimulus or the second time?

Are all MBT Except questions the same as MBF?

Are we supposed to turn off any grammar check feature we have on before taking the argumentative writing section? I saw that Grammarly was on, and I wonder if the proctor will somehow ask us to disable it or if it will be disabled automatically.

Does the warm sea statement not provide support for the statement, "the presence of such a sea is thought by scientists...?" I thought that it provided support to that statement and that statement in turn provides support to the main conclusion. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Since it says "there must be some kinds of soil that contain both clay and sand," i thought the Lawgic would be Soil <-s-> Clay and Sand but in the explanation it's Clay <-s-> Sand. Is the first mapping also correct or wrong?

For "least strengthens," I changed my answer from E because I was thinking that the correct answer strengthens but it's not strong compared to the other AC. Can we choose answers that have nothing to do with the argument for this question type?

When do we look at the premises for answers or the conclusion? I noticed that for the questions that had either or, we were referring to the conclusion to see if its true but for the other conditionals, like B and C, we looked at the premise... #help