@FARMERSTUBBLEFIELD I think it is because it states the medical expert is there to testify to the custom drawings' accuracy. Then if accurate, the court has the ability to determine if it's admissible or not. If the medical expert says it's not accurate, then it cuts off the court's ability to decide if it's admissible or not.

@AlyaElalaoui

If you translate it out, it would be

Sentence 1: Magicians are Real --> Pastries Cook Themselves

Sentence 2: Birds Can Sing --> Magicians are Real

So after connecting the matching terms, it makes:

Birds Can Sing --> Magicians are Real --> Pastries Cook Themselves

Or

Birds can sing --> pastries cook themselves

Written out it would be: If birds can sing, then pastries cook themselves. Which is answer 2.

(Answer 1) Since pastries cooking themselves is necessary for magicians to be real AND birds being able to sing, then The birds cannot sing UNLESS pastries cook themselves.

Which would be written as:

/bird cannot sing --> pastries cook themselves

or (because double negative)

birds can sing --> pastries cook themselves

We're back to the original statement made! They're the same statement just written differently.