15 comments

  • The sentence before literally says "such illustrations would be inadmissible as evidence in the courtroom unless a medical expert were present". Therefore, for something to be admissible, would it not need a medical expert present to testify its accuracy? Having a hard time understanding why A is wrong

    1
  • Had E choose C ooph.

    3
  • Saturday, May 24

    The lessons are good, but the "Take Drill" sections are terrible. The interface sucks

    3
  • Wednesday, Oct 16 2024

    Is it recommended to use scratch paper when completing these low resolution summaries on the actual test? I don't know if I'd be able to remember so many different opinions from one passage.

    6
  • Monday, Sep 23 2024

    How is the expert's role to provide an OPINION? To my understanding the passage states the expert is to explain an illustration.

    4
  • Wednesday, Aug 28 2024

    loving these RC lessons :)

    19
  • Monday, Aug 26 2024

    Do we have access to a search function to search the passage, the way you are able to on the actual LSAT? I've been using command-F, but then it searches the whole page including the 7sage explanation.

    2
  • Tuesday, Aug 20 2024

    It would be very helpful to be able to see the entire prompt so I can answer these questions lol

    3

Confirm action

Are you sure?