@SophiaPatton154 whether or not the cat knocked over the trash can is what was being questioned, the assumption of intentionality is used as support for that argument. support for the claim that the cat knocked over the bin existed, it was just very weak, not non existent. try to remember that the support doesn't have to be good to exist, it just has to be there.

I get 4/5 and the one I missed was allegedly the easiest. Got it on the blind review though so that's good I suppose.

@Hfa Yes exactly right

I can confirm I offered the goats. Not waiting in those damn lines.

@SophiaPatton154 Since he is on the counter licking his paws and it is true that he always does this after eating, it suggests that he COULD have knocked over the trash bin to eat the fish inside. That is support, just very weak support.