User Avatar
IllustriousDaringClassroom
Joined
Mar 2025
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 170
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2027

Applications

Duke
In process
Fordham
In process
Harvard
In process
Pepperdine
In process
Stanford
In process
UChicago
In process
UC - Irvine
In process
UCLA
In process
USD
In process
UVA
In process
Washington & Lee
In process
WashU
In process
William & Mary
In process
Yale
In process

Discussions

LSAT · New feature: study break games
User Avatar
IllustriousDaringClassroom
Sunday, Jun 14

I really enjoyed it!

1
Admissions · 129 to UPenn Law with 7Sage
User Avatar
IllustriousDaringClassroom
Sunday, Jun 7

Such great advice, with lots of great perspectives!

2
LSAT · Sharpen your quantifier logic intuitions
User Avatar
IllustriousDaringClassroom
Tuesday, Jun 2

Loved this drill! Would love to see more of this. Skill Builder Games for different quantifiers would be amazinggg too

1
Lessons · You Try - Minivans and Sports Cars
User Avatar
IllustriousDaringClassroom
Monday, Feb 24, 2025

This helped clear it up for me. Thank you!

1
Lessons · You Try - Minivans and Sports Cars
User Avatar
IllustriousDaringClassroom
Monday, Feb 17, 2025

Hello, I am a little confused. I chose answer D, could someone explain why stating "trading in his car for a minivan would lower his accident risk" is not a sufficient necessary? Is it because it is not factual, like "trading in my minivan means it would definitely lower risk?"Thanks!

2

Confirm action

Are you sure?