User Avatar
IreneC589
Joined
Jul 2026
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 165
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

PrepTests ·
PT142.S1.Q23
User Avatar
IreneC589
Monday, Aug 10

tag, come back afterwards

1
User Avatar
IreneC589
Saturday, Aug 8

Thank you for sharing. May I please know your hourly rate please?

1
PrepTests ·
PT114.S4.Q20
User Avatar
IreneC589
Edited Friday, Jul 31

Hi Folks, this is my understanding of the question:

Conclusion: Developing a hobby is not a successful strategy for overcoming adolescent loneliness

(Premise)because if you lose interest, loneliness may be intensidied.

Loophole: What IF even your loneliness is intensified it's still a successful strategy?

(NA will fight against this loophole) Who said if intensifying loneliness, it's not a successful strategy?

Now, what does B mean?

Conditional Reasoning:

If it's a successful strategy for overcoming adolescent loneliness, then it's not going to intensifying loneliness.

Contrapositive: If intensifying - then not a successful strategy.

Yes, this answers our loophole directly! :)

In order for the reasoning to work to support the conclusion, this is the only argument from answer choices that could answer the loophole.

The relationship is between 'successful strategy' and 'intensifying loneliness'

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?