Dear everyone,

Just a quick question. If we have a A correlates with B and then a A causes B type of argument as a weakening stimulus, can we weaken the argument by showing that a new factor C causes B? or does the AC HAVE to touch on both A and B? I am getting super confused with this concept all of a sudden so any kind of help would be greatly greatly appreciated. Thank you.

This is probably me being totally unreasonable, but what are the chances that LSAC intentionally makes the June 2026 LSAT harder since it is the last LSAT being administered virtually and record number of people are estimated to take the June test? Am legit scared that they might up the difficulty for curving purposes, etc.

I am wondering if what Kevin teaches in his RC lessons actually can be done fast. I know he addressed this in one of his videos, but right now, it feels like it will be impossible for me to read a passage while doing all of the steps (low-res, perspectives, predicting next paragraph & after passage steps) all under timed conditions. I would really love to get there, but I'm wondering if anyone out there (who isn't exceptionally gifted in reading to begin with) actually achieved all the steps under timed conditions. In short: is this even possible?

Thanks!!

First off, thank you so much for creating this program.

I was wondering if you guys still take a look at 7Sage users' analytics? If so, could you please please look at mine? I would love to receive some advice from both of you. Just for some background, my highest official LSAT is a 157 (and that was before I started 7Sage. before that, I only studied with loophole).

I am signed up for the exam in April, but am considering moving it to June because I am not where I want to be at the moment.

Thank you very much!