got it right and its level 5!!!!! mapping out the lawgic is soooo helpful. if you know how to properly translate to lawgic, its so easy to get the answer.
i finally understand why E is wrong. i chose it because i passively assumed that wealth is the same thing as acquiring money and, in the context of the lsat, it isn’t. realistically, sacrificing health to acquire money could be getting $100 for a dangerous stunt. not the same thing as wealth.
i have only gotten 3 questions correct in this entire section and this was the one I felt most confident about lol. got it in 3m bc i grouped health + wealth as happiness. u can't have one without the other
This one was pretty easy for me. I kinda had it in my head but then diagrammed it just to be 100% sure.. One should never sacrifice there health for money because no health = no happiness. Therefore you can then say that sacrificing your health is sacrificing your happiness and from there you can piece it together that the only time we should pursue wealth is when it doesn't come at the cost of our happiness absolutely.
im sorry but the explanations on some of these questions make the bridge to the answer choice more confusing. I fear it's not realistic for me to find an inferred mystery premise within the time limit to answer these questions. sometimes I have to watch these videos multiple times and even then I still don't understand.
Can someone please explain how "One should never sacrifice one's health in order to acquire money" would be "acquire money sacrifices health -> should not acquire money"...? When I first read this, the conditional that I drew up was "in order to acquire money, one should never sacrifice one's health" which would be "acquire money -> /sacrifice one'e health"...
I chose E because I did not confidently identify the conclusion. At this point you think I would because MC/MP is at the core of all the questions that got me this far, but for some reason, I totally neglected to do that here. If you identify that money is part of the conclusion, it is much easier to pick out what must happen for the conclusion to be true.
Got this in 3:22 when I almost gave up -- do not rush, allow yourself to really think through (they give you the conclusion--the correct answer choice should support the conclusion, much like a premise or principle would)
This question had me as confused as a homeless man on house arrest. I got it right after awhile but it was by far one of the most difficult questions I've seen.
These explanations have GOT to stop making such drastic leaps without referencing why something is being done. For instance, the reframing bit at the beginning, along with "kicking the sufficient conditions into the premise set", felt so overwhelming to have thrown at you. Just feel like the last three explanations have done nothing to actually help me understand where I went wrong. Maybe I need to go over the grammar portion again, because I am not getting these SA questions at all.
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
226 comments
Got this one right in time!! These past 3 have been tough and i don't feel solid in my choices.
I've noticed there is not even one single 2-3 difficulty question in the whole unit so far... makes it really hard to keep going.
honestly fuck you for putting 3 5/5 difficulty questions in a row. This does not help some people grasp the concept.
got it right and its level 5!!!!! mapping out the lawgic is soooo helpful. if you know how to properly translate to lawgic, its so easy to get the answer.
i finally understand why E is wrong. i chose it because i passively assumed that wealth is the same thing as acquiring money and, in the context of the lsat, it isn’t. realistically, sacrificing health to acquire money could be getting $100 for a dangerous stunt. not the same thing as wealth.
sneaky assumptions 🤝level 4&5 questions
i fucking hate sufficient assumption
Why are all of these level 5????
how can a one sentence stimulus mess me up lol
I get this question correct intuitively drawing concluding happiness requires health.
OH MY GOD I FINALLY GOT ONE OF THESE RIGHT AND ITS A LVL 5 IM GONNA START CRYIHG
I knew it was A but went with C anyway
i have only gotten 3 questions correct in this entire section and this was the one I felt most confident about lol. got it in 3m bc i grouped health + wealth as happiness. u can't have one without the other
This makes no sense even after the explanation
Second guessed myself smh
This one was pretty easy for me. I kinda had it in my head but then diagrammed it just to be 100% sure.. One should never sacrifice there health for money because no health = no happiness. Therefore you can then say that sacrificing your health is sacrificing your happiness and from there you can piece it together that the only time we should pursue wealth is when it doesn't come at the cost of our happiness absolutely.
Got it....... after 30 minutes..........
These last few are diabolical
im sorry but the explanations on some of these questions make the bridge to the answer choice more confusing. I fear it's not realistic for me to find an inferred mystery premise within the time limit to answer these questions. sometimes I have to watch these videos multiple times and even then I still don't understand.
#PLEASE HELP I HAVE A 157...
Can someone please explain how "One should never sacrifice one's health in order to acquire money" would be "acquire money sacrifices health -> should not acquire money"...? When I first read this, the conditional that I drew up was "in order to acquire money, one should never sacrifice one's health" which would be "acquire money -> /sacrifice one'e health"...
Please help... please...
I chose E because I did not confidently identify the conclusion. At this point you think I would because MC/MP is at the core of all the questions that got me this far, but for some reason, I totally neglected to do that here. If you identify that money is part of the conclusion, it is much easier to pick out what must happen for the conclusion to be true.
Someone tell me that makes sense!
I cannot read the writing in the video. It makes the video very hard to follow and understand.
Got this in 3:22 when I almost gave up -- do not rush, allow yourself to really think through (they give you the conclusion--the correct answer choice should support the conclusion, much like a premise or principle would)
This question had me as confused as a homeless man on house arrest. I got it right after awhile but it was by far one of the most difficult questions I've seen.
These explanations have GOT to stop making such drastic leaps without referencing why something is being done. For instance, the reframing bit at the beginning, along with "kicking the sufficient conditions into the premise set", felt so overwhelming to have thrown at you. Just feel like the last three explanations have done nothing to actually help me understand where I went wrong. Maybe I need to go over the grammar portion again, because I am not getting these SA questions at all.
THREE CURVEBALLS, Lord help me I can't do this