For further understanding - in the same paragraph where A is shown to be wrong in the explanation, it doesn't explain the part of the paragraph saying "even if such a CEO's purpose is to look at the public good and nothing else, they should still work to maximize profits" and in the sentence before that it is indicate this extends to any instance where the CEO is not obligated to maximize profits. Is the only reason A is wrong then because charities are not explicitly stated as being a part of this? Or just because it is a 'most likely to agree' question and that B is a stronger choice?

#feedback like other people, understand why A is the correct answer choice, but I don't agree with the answer explanation or why D is not correct. Arnot is saying what would happen if the government did a certain thing, not that it ever would or even if it were possible that it could. The subscriber then responds by saying that Arnot is wrong for making an assumption that the government would actually ever implement these changes, which Arnot never does. That is a distortion, is it not?

How are we to know that the "prescribed dosage" in answer choice D is referring to the originally prescribed dosage, and not the doubled prescribed dosage? I realize now I was too quick to make the assumption that the answer choice was talking about the doubled dosage, in which case the answer makes no sense. I used POE to get to answer choice C, and I still don't understand how there is no evidence that the beverage was responsible or the prescribed medication -- he doubled dosage only worked when he stopped drinking the beverage.

Can someone help explain why further impediments brought up in answer B actually matter? Because if the counterfeit money was made incapable of being replicated based on the inability to accurately measure the images, then even if there were impediments later on in the process, how would that affect this argument? The counterfeit money would no longer be able to make copies because of the first step (or just previous step) of getting the measurements right, so why wouldn't anything having to do with the next steps then be rendered null and void when trying to have the argument follow logically?

I know this doesn't matter to the actual question/answers provided here, but just to understand the question better, how could several small design companies have prestigious awards for their corporate work if no corporate managers will hire small companies?