Can someone explain to me why it is unreasonable to assume that banning smoking in workplaces offers some protection to people outside of their workplaces? Those people presumably have some protection from secondhand smoke when they visit other people's workplaces, such as grocery stores or restaurants.
I see why E is correct, but I fail to understand why C isn't also correct. Are we living in a hypothetical world where no one is ever a customer or visitor in someone else's workplace?
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
Can someone explain to me why it is unreasonable to assume that banning smoking in workplaces offers some protection to people outside of their workplaces? Those people presumably have some protection from secondhand smoke when they visit other people's workplaces, such as grocery stores or restaurants.
I see why E is correct, but I fail to understand why C isn't also correct. Are we living in a hypothetical world where no one is ever a customer or visitor in someone else's workplace?