1. Disney is automatic and requires no assumptions to arrive straight at conclusion.

2. Tiger is intuitively strong but we must make some assumptions, and they can be debated, for example does aggressiveness, or the ability to cause injuries, always mean unsuitability?

3. Fat Cat is hypothetical - there is not one solid proof.

Some ambiguity here, no?

Stimulus not clear if 'persons' equals (or not) 'members'.

B - definitely no members with interests live in burbs: we know that.