- Joined
- Sep 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
@OliviaRob This is a good question. Hopefully an answer comes. Thanks in advance!
@EagerEye Same. I understood the principle without issue when doing the question but could not discern if the opinion shared = agree or disagree, or if the other two even had an opinion..
Hope everyone is doing well this weekend.
As the title shows, I am seeking a tutor that has the special ability to train me on successfully diagramming Conditional Questions and detecting Casual Questions. Italics and bold were used because simply said, I do not understand Conditional Questions.
On the official November 2025 LSAT, I was able to score a 157. On various PTs through 7Sage, I have been able to score 158, 162, 165, and 169.
I am trying to master conditionals because they absolutely ruin my sections, and ultimately, my days. I did well in an Intro to Logic class in college and yet, I'm still struggling mapping them out correctly.
Casual is a bit more understood but still gives me a fair bit of trouble.
In essence, I am looking for someone that has had experience with someone like me and that was able to break-through to them. My budget is up to $50 an hour. If it goes well, I would be happy to go beyond learning just this and picking up any other points I can along the road.
Thank you all.
@wgresh I chose C as well but was hesitant simply because the passage this even can trigger such changes. I saw answer choice C as too strong/conclusive... "they change when they become carnivores." Not sure if I'm looking too far into this but I was able to eliminate D (other choice I was stuck on) because it doesn't call the theory into question really.