- Joined
- Feb 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
I made a slightly different diagram where I treated the city should always do what is needed as, If the city always does what makes good economic sense, it needs to purchase new subway cars. So, If the city makes good economic sense, it has efficient, attractive subway and if the city always does what makes good economic sense, it needs to purchase new subway cars then new cars are required in order to make good economic sense.
Good Economic Sense: GES
Efficient, Attract Subway cars: EAS
Purchase New Cars: PNS
Premise: GES —> EAS
—————————————
Conclusion: GES —> New Cars
Missing Link: EAS —> New Cars (In order efficient attractive subway requires new cars)
I may be wrong but I treated needs as a necessary indicator and thought that in this case, always doesn’t necessarily have to be an indicator. For example If the city always wants to make good economic sense, it needs to purchase new subway cars.
I actually took most of the day and played the games. I was going well on the PTs and a lot the questions I had issues with were little conditional mistakes so weirdly doing the little things to refine my general skills seemed to help with actual LR drills, especially those that used conditional and set logic.
Thank you so much for the advice. 😊
Just wondering if anyone had any resources or cheat sheets the like using to practice and reference general skills for LR. I was thinking like Conditional Logic and Logic of Sets i.e., things that are a little more generally applied.
I honestly think the games has been the most helpful in fixing those on the fly and time pressure “easy” mistakes that make the difference in a good and great score. I second you in saying that more questions would be awesome for games like Argument ER so that I can continue making my time to identify missing links even faster.