Also, notice that if you don't change the wording in Step 2, the "winner" will always be A. But, if you do decide (and there are sometimes good reasons) to change the wording, e.g. "Which ones taste more unpleasant?" then the "winner" changes to B. The medications in tablet or soft-gel form "wins" in that they taste more unpleasant.

This one doesn't make any sense to me, or maybe this is just a bad example. If you change what the sentence is comparing the subjects on, then the winner would be decided based on the context.

The reason this example is confusing is because there's no context behind the sentence. If we wanted to know which medication tasted less unpleasant, then changing the wording to "more unpleasant" would make B the "winner". But, if we wanted to know which one tasted worse, then the reverse would happen. The "more unpleasant" one would be the winner, and the "less unpleasant" one would be the loser.

It just seems to me that the example is basing the winner on which ones tastes better, but nowhere does it say that that's what were looking for. If were assuming that everything stays the same (the assumption that were looking for which one tastes less unpleasant) when the wording changes, then sure. Maybe including a something like "If all else stays the same..." would make it easier to understand.

3/3 im so locked

Tiger: Not every car drives smoothly over bumpy roads. After all, all car manufacturers use different suspension systems.

Disney: VIP Beach Club party goers have rooftop access within the building. You need to be considered as a high societal status individual, either by being a celebrity or being wealthy, to have VIP access at the Beach Club. John isn't a celebrity nor a person of wealth, so he must have paid a lot of money to be at the Beach Club rooftop tonight.

Trash Bin: Eric recently came back from a trip abroad and realized all his coins are gone from his piggy bank. His parents have stolen from him before. Therefore, Eric's parents must have taken his coins.