3/3 and then i changed my answer on blind review for question 2 ughhhh alsoooo agree it's better to just take it super slow at first (builds confidence) and then start timing yourself once you are more familiar with the structures
1/3 the first time because I was trying to move fast and wasn't using the indicators, but the second try I slowed down and actually thought about what I was doing and got 3/3.
Echo what everyone else is saying about taking my time and making sure I understood what each part of the argument was doing. I've also done a fair amount of drills and did the free lawhub stuff so I often feel like I'm in a stage where I can overthink and psych myself out of an easy answer - but 3/3!
GOT ALL 3/3 RIGHT. I am not worried about the time so far. 2 minutes over on question 1, 1:17 minutes over question 2, and only 9 seconds over question 3.
Wasted most of my time on question 2 where I really frustrated myself, but would have saved a lot of time if I read the question stem prior to the stimulus and was able to pick out the information it was looking for.
Went 3/3 only going over a minute on question 2 and being right on time for the others.
I got 3/3, didn't find the questions to hard and I generally realize that the key to understanding the answer is to trust yourself to correctly outline what is context, premise, conclusion etc...
3/3! Honestly, I took a while, but I really wanted to digest the info presented and what the questions were asking. I'm excited to get faster at these!
got all three again! but man I need to get my time down. perhaps later we can learn some strategies on how to eliminate questions quicker with accuracy!
got 3/3 but got confused on the third one even tho i got it right how is it ruling out an alternative way to get the benefits? I was 100% sure it supported the conclusion my thought process is the other part
The middle one was hard. Then I realized that the first claim is not the "primary justification" for it, but what follows regarding the near-maximal efficiency in farmland.
Can someone explain the blind review? Mine says too much time spent, doesn't show any additional information or tips. Do I just hit next and move on?
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
82 comments
3/3 LETS GO
3/3 and then i changed my answer on blind review for question 2 ughhhh alsoooo agree it's better to just take it super slow at first (builds confidence) and then start timing yourself once you are more familiar with the structures
2/3. I think I need to take more time for now but I was still 30 seconds over on 2 questions
1/3 the first time because I was trying to move fast and wasn't using the indicators, but the second try I slowed down and actually thought about what I was doing and got 3/3.
3/3!!
3/3! So glad the studying is paying off! but I do need to work on answering the questions faster...
so far getting all the questions right! however, I need to significantly improve my timing LOL. guess that just comes with practice over....time
Echo what everyone else is saying about taking my time and making sure I understood what each part of the argument was doing. I've also done a fair amount of drills and did the free lawhub stuff so I often feel like I'm in a stage where I can overthink and psych myself out of an easy answer - but 3/3!
Got caught up on #1 ... think I was moving too fast! Gah!
GOT ALL 3/3 RIGHT. I am not worried about the time so far. 2 minutes over on question 1, 1:17 minutes over question 2, and only 9 seconds over question 3.
Wasted most of my time on question 2 where I really frustrated myself, but would have saved a lot of time if I read the question stem prior to the stimulus and was able to pick out the information it was looking for.
Went 3/3 only going over a minute on question 2 and being right on time for the others.
I got 3/3, didn't find the questions to hard and I generally realize that the key to understanding the answer is to trust yourself to correctly outline what is context, premise, conclusion etc...
3/3! Honestly, I took a while, but I really wanted to digest the info presented and what the questions were asking. I'm excited to get faster at these!
Got all three. Went over on time on all three, but not by a ton.
got all three again! but man I need to get my time down. perhaps later we can learn some strategies on how to eliminate questions quicker with accuracy!
I got all 3 correct because
I ignored the time!
Took my time to read the questions and understand what it is saying.
Broke down the arguments into (Premise, Conclusion, intermediate conclusion, Context)
I was aware of the indicator words
Note: I take double the amount of time to get it done, but thats ok for now.
2/3. BR 2nd question and still got it wrong. I just don’t understand how it’s an intermediate conclusion.
got 3/3 but got confused on the third one even tho i got it right how is it ruling out an alternative way to get the benefits? I was 100% sure it supported the conclusion my thought process is the other part
1/3 for the first try, then without looking 3/3 Idk how to feel really.
3/3, wow I'm surprised I got all 3. I need to work on my time though
3/3
The middle one was hard. Then I realized that the first claim is not the "primary justification" for it, but what follows regarding the near-maximal efficiency in farmland.
2/3 this time, but im gone get them all right next time
3/3 but struggling to meet the timing. I’ve tried focusing less on comprehension and more on argument structure but it’s equally damning.
Can someone explain the blind review? Mine says too much time spent, doesn't show any additional information or tips. Do I just hit next and move on?