Can you further explain why A is wrong? The explanation video isn't really helpful, as it seems to just brush off the answer without any real backing for why.

I picked AC C because in the third paragraph it says "The CMC would consist primarily of people from metropolitan areas who value fresh produce."

Doesn't this insinuate theyre the most likely to join?

@7SageTutor What if it was successful 4 years ago, but the reason they have to continue looking for options in present day is because the fish returned? Seems like a reasonable assumption.

It seems like the poison could have been successful, but they still had to find alternatives because of the other negative outcomes

I don't understand why B is not correct. The stim says "all other people...to ALWAYS have the motivation to implement their ideas." Can't we infer this means they invariably implement their solutions?

I assumed that the employees in the stim who did not wear back belts were also part of the Flegco Corporation, as it did not specify they were employees of a different company. Anyone else?

I thought we were supposed to take the premises as true and since the sentence about recent studies is a premise, shouldn't we take it as true and not question whether or not the bullhead catfish is actually the most populous?

He says C is incorrect because it doesn't specifically tie to the argument's content, but technically A doesn't either right? So how does that make sense?

Anyone have a better explanation for why D is not correct?

Can someone explain the concept of a naive assumption

I feel as though B is also logically inferred. If violence is a form of aggression, then isn't it still accurate to say that "The self-expression required for survival is generally nonaggressive"

Getting confused on the fine line between making inferences. Is it ALWAYS bad to make an inference about what the speaker may think or feel about something, or is it sometimes reasonable?

Struggling to understand how this is really going to help on the LSAT as you have no time to go through this process of connecting different statements.