5/5! next steps would be to find a more reduced and simple way to notate the predicates of the sentence. for example, with Q2, i said "over 40 --> /learn to ski" while the example said "over 40 --> /want to learn to ski." i'm not sure how important the distinguishing of these more complex subjects will be in the future, but it's probably better to be more specific than not?

i was confused on Q2, and thought that there wasn't an argument. I think I was taken aback by how similar all of the words meshed together into the paragraph. But, I realize that there is still a "claim" being made based on the premise/support given in the first sentence. Ultimately, it is the relationship these support claims have with the conclusion that help us determine what the argument is.