- Joined
- Sep 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
Question about the last example given for chaining conditionals. 'Therefore, one CANNOT become a jedi UNLESS one possesses extraordinary discipline.' This translates to /D ---> /J CP: J --> D. Granted, I understand how to get there, but I can think of /J --> /D CP: D --> J. Why can't it be the latter? The lessons on group #3 and #4 conditionals mention you can choose which idea you please on either the suf or nec side.
For #3, the 'AND' confused me, as I believed the 'AND' turns into an 'OR' when you flip and negate. In this case, this was not done because ' properly follows the chain of logic' is one concept instead of two?
For 'Tom is not taller than Athena,' is it fine to also assume 'Tom is shorter than Athena' as well? #help
Hello, looking to see if there are other individuals in the NYC area wanting to meet on weekends to discuss wrong answers and go over practice problems together. I have been advised that really focusing on wrong answers and understanding them will help significantly; thus, I wanted to create a study group just focused on this. I am prepping for the June exam as I work full time, thus, I need more runway to study. Feel free to message me!
I will get a 172+ on the November LSAT!