- Joined
- Aug 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
@IvonneRosario I understand, I just remember seeing comments from JY and Kevin saying "Likely this week" or "Very very soon" so I was expecting that. Do you have any idea of when it will be released?
@Jackielynn honestly take my comment with a grain of salt because I struggled with this question as well. Based on the explanation video, I kind of see what they’re saying. I would like you to focus on simply just the conclusion as well as the last sentence regarding the seven day cycle having too little significance. That premise (the last sentence of the stimulus) is only talking about seven day cycles, however, what if there was a non-seven day cycle? Could that NATURAL cycle have enough significance to constitute as an explanation to the phenomenon? If so, the argument is destroyed, we can no longer sufficiently conclude that the explanation to the phenomenon is due to non-natural (people’s) influences.
My main issue with that answer choice is we don’t know whether a non-seven day cycle can constitute as an explanation to the phenomenon, so it doesn’t destroy the argument completely when negated, just slightly.
If anyone has any criticisms to my comment, please let me know.
I was curious when we should be able to see the analytics of each question on PT 159? Would like to know the difficulty.
@Kevin_Lin Would greatly appreciate an update on the video explanation being implemented.