@Snowman123 I usually try to notice when I'm helping an answer choice out by inserting my own assumptions for it. In this case the jump from early to opening statements is a necessary assumption for the answer to be correct. (Or at least more correct).

It's definitely a natural part of evaluating each answer choice, so it's hard to disentangle assumptions we make as we scrutinize and compare. So damn hard. Hope that was helpful! GL!

It's starting to click🥲

(A) felt too heavy handed in strengthening the argument, then included introducing an extraneous factor (the new technology). It was still compelling but reeked of a trap answer.

(C) gave itself away with the "not many," it was too open for that squirming argument.

(D) I negated "Some" and that was it.

Definitely felt like this module was hopelessly handing me my whole ass. 23 seconds over so I still got a ways to go, but it feels so nice to see improvement! Chin up guys!