User Avatar
Lexxe
Joined
Apr 2026
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 180
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2028

Discussions

User Avatar
Lexxe
Friday, May 29

Difficulty level = 6/5

5
User Avatar
Lexxe
Edited Wednesday, May 20

Not sure if this will help anyone, but I answered this quickly doing a VERY shallow (maybe oversimplied) dip:

.

It's either this or that (but not both).

It's not this.

-------------------------------------

Therefore, it's that.

.

It's either 10 cents (normal classroom) or 15 cents (lab)

It's not 10 cents (normal classroom).

-------------------------------------

Therefore, it's 15 cents (lab).

4
User Avatar
Lexxe
Saturday, May 9

@ogreen26 No problem! :)

1
User Avatar
Lexxe
Friday, May 8

@coconut Yeah I was confused too until I watched the video. He explains that it's "some" because the conclusion he draws is that some things are both poisonous and have some benefit. You're right that it's also valid to say "most" if you're drawing your conclusion specifically about potions. His reasoning in the video for going with the more general conclusion is that the LSAT will more commonly test on that sort of interpretation. I hope that helps :)

2
PrepTests ·
PT135.S4.Q23
User Avatar
Lexxe
Thursday, Apr 30

Never seen a better example of a question to skip on test day

7
PrepTests ·
PT132.S4.Q8
User Avatar
Lexxe
Sunday, Apr 19

Was anyone else thrown by the word "concern" in the correct answer choice?

2
User Avatar
Lexxe
Monday, Apr 13

@Lexxe So turns out this is true but there's a lesson down the line stating it explicitly lol

1
User Avatar
Lexxe
Saturday, Apr 11

Does anyone know if the takeaway below from question #4 is correct?

From the lessons, formal argument #5 is "Most before All". We cannot make a valid conclusion from question #4 because the premises written lawgically are actually "All before Most". We can only draw a conclusion when the "most" arrow comes before the "all" arrow, not the other way around.

2

Confirm action

Are you sure?