Hello. I'm going over the core curriculum and JY tells us in order to negate "all" statements like "A -> B," you make it to "A <-some-> /B." However, in the next lesson, he tells us when you negate "conditional" statements like "A -> B," you negate it to "A and /B." My question is how do we differentiate between the two? Isn't an "all" statement the same as a "conditional" statement? If I say "all dogs are friendly," that is surely an "all" statement and diagramed as the conditional statement "dog -> friendly." Thus, I do not see the difference between the two.
PT Questions
LuigiGranata
- Joined
- Aug 2025
- Subscription
- Live
I saw an explanation that said A -> B and A-some-> C = can conclude C -some-> B. Why is that and where can I find lessons on these types of conditionals?
LuigiGranata
Monday, Nov 10 2025
I wrote the second conditional as “company -> rarely hire people not concerned with financial gain.” Why was this incorrect?
So if you didn't know what temperate zones were, you wouldn't be able to get this question right?