@EACWORLD agreed. I quickly eliminated it because I couldn't find any support. D also implies the astronomy research should provide info about earth, which seems narrow and unsupported.

@EricT024 I feel for A. I was confident that E was too narrowly focused on the support from the last paragraph, only, to capture the whole passage. Despite recognizing E was a spot on match for the author's perspective. Opps.

I'm struggling to see how Ginsburg conceding that Western technology will not be neutral is a fundamental rejection of Weiner's position. Isn't that an acknowledgement that Weiner's position holds some value? Except her concession doesn't fully align with Weiner's position, which is how the question is specifically worded. Still odd to me.