Self-study
ParmelieAndris
- Joined
- Apr 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
Goal score: 170
CAS GPA
3.17
1L START YEAR
2027
Applications
Baylor
In process
Baylor
In process
Georgetown
In process
Georgetown
In process
Houston
In process
Houston
In process
Pennsylvania State - Penn State Law
In process
Pennsylvania State - Penn State Law
In process
Temple University
In process
Temple University
In process
Texas A&M
In process
Texas A&M
In process
UDC
In process
UDC
In process
U Florida
In process
U Florida
In process
UT Austin
In process
UT Austin
In process
Discussions
ParmelieAndris
Wednesday, Apr 29
I think that I am confusing myself.
I understand the A--> B. (sufficient to necessary)
This is where i am confusing myself
Example: If one is a practicing lawyer, then one has passed the bar exam. This baby is not a practicing lawyer. So, this baby has not passed the bar exam.
In this example- is this not supported because we don't know what the outcome of someone not passing is?
I said yes the last two examples and got them wrong.
Thank You in advance!
Thank you so much for this!
I think what also helps is breaking down the quantifiers into everyday language.
For example:
Most people = more than half
When I see the word some, I think at least one
Is there a chance you could make a guide for the logical opposites of quantifiers such as some, most, all, never, etc.?
Thank you in advance!