I'm not liking (E) for a few reasons. First was just semantic in that it spoke hypothetically about something actively happening, whereas (B) spoke about what is happening which made more sense given the timeline presented. But also, the conclusion doesn't seem to me to deny that global warming can cause storms, only that that effect wouldn't be borne out, as would rule out (B). This doesn't affect (E), but makes (B) feel like an equally attractive answer. Help!
3
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
I'm not liking (E) for a few reasons. First was just semantic in that it spoke hypothetically about something actively happening, whereas (B) spoke about what is happening which made more sense given the timeline presented. But also, the conclusion doesn't seem to me to deny that global warming can cause storms, only that that effect wouldn't be borne out, as would rule out (B). This doesn't affect (E), but makes (B) feel like an equally attractive answer. Help!