I'm not liking (E) for a few reasons. First was just semantic in that it spoke hypothetically about something actively happening, whereas (B) spoke about what is happening which made more sense given the timeline presented. But also, the conclusion doesn't seem to me to deny that global warming can cause storms, only that that effect wouldn't be borne out, as would rule out (B). This doesn't affect (E), but makes (B) feel like an equally attractive answer. Help!