I'm realizing how that i actually am pretty decent at solving the problems but my issue is i keep rushing bc im worried about time!! during BR when i intentionally take the time to carefully read through each Q i can pick the right answer 9/10 ugh i need to slow down
@ElianaC Yeah it tries to make you assume that because earlier discussions thought global warming would cause something that they then did not consider any other factors. Maybe they did consider other factors and still decided global warming would cause something. We don’t know what all went into the full analysis, only the result of it. Tricky
I was reading this question think it was a MSS question, I had to rethink the way I was thinking after reading the question stem one more time and ended up picking the right answer 😩
So I thought this was still a type of MSS. Therefore, I picked D, because it was exactly what the premise stated. Now based on the video I undertsand I was supposed to draw directly from the conclusion and match that to the answer choices. However, had this been a question that clearly stated which choice MSS, would D have been correct? Also, how would I know going forward that this "most accruately expresses" is not the same as as "most strongly supports/supported by" type of question?
"most accruately expresses" - this tells us to basically regurgitate the conclusion (or reasoning, depending on what the question is asking for, could be "the reasoning most accurately expresses___ or the conclusion/hypothesis most accurately expresses___"). Remember that the answer choice won't always be ideal.
read the stim, find the conclusion, hunt for the answer
"most strongly supports/supported by" questions - tell us to look at the answer choices and see what is supported by the stimulus. The correct answer choice will have a statement that is much more likely to be true after reading the stimulus. All other answer choices are unsupported. They're not more or less likely to be true.
I was between E and D and ultimately chose D because of the wording in the stimulus (unlikely, are likely) and question E said that Global warming "will not" (aka certain to not) produce...
@MRod I got the question wrong for that exact same reason. The word "probably" makes e more accurate than D. D is saying that the wind flow "will" (certainly, 100%, is going to happen) negate the effect even though the stimulus says that it is "likely". Logically both answers seem right, but when I broke it down like that I was able to see why D is wrong.
My issue was that i was essentially reading everything as essentially context especially with what the recent research was saying. and the other factors
I almost fell for it! I even picked answer choice B first. Then I had an epiphany. The fact that other factors contribute to tropical storm development apart from global warming is not a conclusion, it is a premise! A premise presented as evidence used to challenge the prediction. But the conclusion is that the prediction is wrong.
I'm not liking (E) for a few reasons. First was just semantic in that it spoke hypothetically about something actively happening, whereas (B) spoke about what is happening which made more sense given the timeline presented. But also, the conclusion doesn't seem to me to deny that global warming can cause storms, only that that effect wouldn't be borne out, as would rule out (B). This doesn't affect (E), but makes (B) feel like an equally attractive answer. Help!
@Peterhinkle 1. The timeline is: tropical storms require heat and moisture -> so they form over ocean surfaces that global warming would encourage -> based on this, early discussions of global warming predicted that global warming would cause more frequent and intense tropical storms (because global warming encourages ocean temperatures that provide the right conditions for the formation of tropical storms). I'm not entirely sure on what you mean about the semantics of each answer choice, so forgive me if I've misunderstood you, but I think the fact that E is speaking hypothetically about something actively happening makes it an attractive answer. The author's conclusion is rejecting a prediction put forward by earlier discussions, rather than an actively-happening phenomenon. The actively-happening phenomenon would be the formation of tropical storms, but that's not what the author is focused on. The author cares about the predictive causes of the formation of tropical storms, which earlier discussions cite as global warming, which the author is disagreeing with. If you were dissuaded by the "probably," remember that answers to MC questions should paraphrase the conclusion—so, the "probably will not" can be conflated with the "unlikely to" in the conclusion.
2. The conclusion is denying the prediction that global warming would cause more frequent and intense tropical storms, because there's at least one other factor that would counteract, or work against, global warming in causing more tropical storms. The effect of global warming on tropical storms is a hypothesis championed by some other people, not the author. The author is saying the prediction that global warming will cause more storms will not be borne out, as in the prediction will not take place.
@Peterhinkle The conclusion kind of speaks hypothetically. "Recent research shows, this prediction [global warming causing tropical storms] is unlikely to be borne out." So, "Global warming probably will not produce more... tropical storms" is a pretty good restatement of that. Hope that helps!
@Yanirj5678 I had that issue too, and one thing that helped me was when J.Y. said that there are 4 obviously incorrect, embarrassingly wrong answers. That lesson helped me hunt right answers better.
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Sorry, you need a subscription for that.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
139 comments
I'm realizing how that i actually am pretty decent at solving the problems but my issue is i keep rushing bc im worried about time!! during BR when i intentionally take the time to carefully read through each Q i can pick the right answer 9/10 ugh i need to slow down
B almost got me…
@danjpeach96 Same but the explanation video clarifies it really well
@ElianaC Yeah it tries to make you assume that because earlier discussions thought global warming would cause something that they then did not consider any other factors. Maybe they did consider other factors and still decided global warming would cause something. We don’t know what all went into the full analysis, only the result of it. Tricky
Wrong section?
@MA66 Good to revisit
I was reading this question think it was a MSS question, I had to rethink the way I was thinking after reading the question stem one more time and ended up picking the right answer 😩
So I thought this was still a type of MSS. Therefore, I picked D, because it was exactly what the premise stated. Now based on the video I undertsand I was supposed to draw directly from the conclusion and match that to the answer choices. However, had this been a question that clearly stated which choice MSS, would D have been correct? Also, how would I know going forward that this "most accruately expresses" is not the same as as "most strongly supports/supported by" type of question?
@JuliannaCalder
"most accruately expresses" - this tells us to basically regurgitate the conclusion (or reasoning, depending on what the question is asking for, could be "the reasoning most accurately expresses___ or the conclusion/hypothesis most accurately expresses___"). Remember that the answer choice won't always be ideal.
read the stim, find the conclusion, hunt for the answer
"most strongly supports/supported by" questions - tell us to look at the answer choices and see what is supported by the stimulus. The correct answer choice will have a statement that is much more likely to be true after reading the stimulus. All other answer choices are unsupported. They're not more or less likely to be true.
read the stim & eliminate wrong answer choices
@GabrielLerma Thank you!
@JuliannaCalder ofc! I hope this helped
I'm annoyed I got this wrong but got it on the BR. I chose B before finishing reading the full answer. Bleh
got during the BR, really leaning into BR. First going based on speed versus BR having time to break it down and not rely on first pass.
sneaky sneaky!
I feel like I’m going backwards
@AndreCarter SAME !!!
Couldn't you also say that B is wrong because it is summarizing a premise
I found the author's opinion and still picked the wrong AC. SMH
@Mina.G Same. B is tricky.
i definitely misread the question lol
Oh my god, I didn't even realize this was a main conclusion question! I was like, "How is that incorrect!?" 🤦♀️
damn, got this one wrong, I chose D. Very tricky!
I literally got this one wrong because I thought it was still MSS. Gotta slow down and make sure to read the question stem.
@EdithM Same!! I picked B then D! Ugh. Great learning lesson though!
@KateA I did the same :(
I didn't see this was a main conclusion question and was answering as if it was a MSS question. I need sleep.
@epayne17 same here thought my mind was playing tricks on me because i didn't read question stem
I was between E and D and ultimately chose D because of the wording in the stimulus (unlikely, are likely) and question E said that Global warming "will not" (aka certain to not) produce...
@MRod I got the question wrong for that exact same reason. The word "probably" makes e more accurate than D. D is saying that the wind flow "will" (certainly, 100%, is going to happen) negate the effect even though the stimulus says that it is "likely". Logically both answers seem right, but when I broke it down like that I was able to see why D is wrong.
What helped me with this question was examining the indicator word "unlikely" in the stimulus. That is what sealed the deal for me between E and D.
The stimulus, "this prediction is unlikely to be borne out", is the same as saying, "I am more than 50% sure that the prediction is wrong".
Answer choice E then states a rephrasing of that sentence, "probably will not". More likely than not.
My issue was that i was essentially reading everything as essentially context especially with what the recent research was saying. and the other factors
I almost fell for it! I even picked answer choice B first. Then I had an epiphany. The fact that other factors contribute to tropical storm development apart from global warming is not a conclusion, it is a premise! A premise presented as evidence used to challenge the prediction. But the conclusion is that the prediction is wrong.
LSAT I am learning your dirty tricks!
Fell for it!! Got it in the BR though😮💨
I'm not liking (E) for a few reasons. First was just semantic in that it spoke hypothetically about something actively happening, whereas (B) spoke about what is happening which made more sense given the timeline presented. But also, the conclusion doesn't seem to me to deny that global warming can cause storms, only that that effect wouldn't be borne out, as would rule out (B). This doesn't affect (E), but makes (B) feel like an equally attractive answer. Help!
@Peterhinkle 1. The timeline is: tropical storms require heat and moisture -> so they form over ocean surfaces that global warming would encourage -> based on this, early discussions of global warming predicted that global warming would cause more frequent and intense tropical storms (because global warming encourages ocean temperatures that provide the right conditions for the formation of tropical storms). I'm not entirely sure on what you mean about the semantics of each answer choice, so forgive me if I've misunderstood you, but I think the fact that E is speaking hypothetically about something actively happening makes it an attractive answer. The author's conclusion is rejecting a prediction put forward by earlier discussions, rather than an actively-happening phenomenon. The actively-happening phenomenon would be the formation of tropical storms, but that's not what the author is focused on. The author cares about the predictive causes of the formation of tropical storms, which earlier discussions cite as global warming, which the author is disagreeing with. If you were dissuaded by the "probably," remember that answers to MC questions should paraphrase the conclusion—so, the "probably will not" can be conflated with the "unlikely to" in the conclusion.
2. The conclusion is denying the prediction that global warming would cause more frequent and intense tropical storms, because there's at least one other factor that would counteract, or work against, global warming in causing more tropical storms. The effect of global warming on tropical storms is a hypothesis championed by some other people, not the author. The author is saying the prediction that global warming will cause more storms will not be borne out, as in the prediction will not take place.
@Peterhinkle The conclusion kind of speaks hypothetically. "Recent research shows, this prediction [global warming causing tropical storms] is unlikely to be borne out." So, "Global warming probably will not produce more... tropical storms" is a pretty good restatement of that. Hope that helps!
I got it correct in my initial run, but blind review I picked the trap answer. I always narrow it down to the "two best answers"!
@Yanirj5678 I had that issue too, and one thing that helped me was when J.Y. said that there are 4 obviously incorrect, embarrassingly wrong answers. That lesson helped me hunt right answers better.
Got it right in blind review! I'll take that as a win. found my error in my original thought process and corrected it
I got the right answer but I took longer than I thought. Even with extra time, I still struggle with taking too long oh well