- Joined
- May 2026
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
What about social media? We can just share it digitally? There are prints that people can access.
I am starting this post by admitting that it may be a stupid question (or not I am genuinely torn on this) but would it be wise to use scratch paper on the LSAT? I am taking the test in August 2026 and it will be on a computer. I know LSAC has stated they will provide a pencil and scratch paper but would that just waste time? Is it reasonable to study with no paper and pencil? Im afraid I will just waste time by writing but I also believe my accuracy could go skyrocket if I wrote down the logic instead of trying to sort it out in my head? Please give me your advice.
@ambam It is possible you are overthinking them. LSAT tests your ability to think in a new and non-intuitive kind of way. Maybe easier questions are beating you by making you think too much and rely on a your regular way of thinking that is not apt for LSAT. Basically, stick to what the rules and lessons say. If this is not the case I apologize. I am sort of projecting what my biggest weakness was when I began studying. I would overthink the simplest questions and would make me go back to how I normally think about challenging questions which was not reflective of my studies. Continue drilling and reviewing the videos. You will see it eventually!
Makes no sense... the rule is that it must rectify any unfair RESULT from an unfair SITUATION. We have an unfair situation, but the way that choice C is written, implies there is no unfair RESULT. The chance of something happening is not an unfair result. I made my teacher angry and now there is a CHANCE that she will cold call me. That is not an unfair result. An unfair result is if she actually cold calls me in class. Which would be unfair. I did not pick C because I don't believe the principle was fulfilled. Sure, there is a chance that an unfair result will occur but that is not enough to cross the required threshold. How can the company rectify something that has technically not happened. Once the result actually occurs (customers actually not applying for the rebate because of the early exp date) then the Corp. is obligated to rectify it. There is a chance I'll crash my vehicle into my neighbor's mailbox EVERY DAY I get in my car and drive off to work. Does that mean I need to pay mailbox damage every time I get in my car? NOOO because I have not hit the mailbox yet.
I rest my case. If I am totally off the mark... I'm sorry. That was just my rationale in the drill.