The way I understood the conclusion not being valid was the superset being students. If kumar is not a student, then him being not being late despite being 17+ past the bell does is possible because he does not even belong to the superset to begin with. The way it is written sorta tricks you into assuming that kumar is a student as well. If kumar is a student, and arrives 17 minutes late, then I believe that it would be a valid conclusion. Aside from the logic side of it which did not click exactly, it appears that to draw the conclusion you are making an assumption whether it is conscious of unconscious. For the conclusion to be valid, you need to remove those assumptions. If this isn't correct someone please tell me. Its what clicked best so far.
@nikechi unless people have easy to understand and consistent desires basically
0
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
The way I understood the conclusion not being valid was the superset being students. If kumar is not a student, then him being not being late despite being 17+ past the bell does is possible because he does not even belong to the superset to begin with. The way it is written sorta tricks you into assuming that kumar is a student as well. If kumar is a student, and arrives 17 minutes late, then I believe that it would be a valid conclusion. Aside from the logic side of it which did not click exactly, it appears that to draw the conclusion you are making an assumption whether it is conscious of unconscious. For the conclusion to be valid, you need to remove those assumptions. If this isn't correct someone please tell me. Its what clicked best so far.