User Avatar
Reneloveslsat
Joined
Jun 2025
Subscription
Core
PrepTests ·
PT116.S2.Q8
User Avatar
Reneloveslsat
2 days ago

@Berryanalytical The argument is saying that if there is an increase in robbery time in jail, then it will not effect in stopping people from committing robbery. We need to find a answer choice that does not strength. With except questions there will be four choices that strength and one that does not. A would strengthen the argument because if they are motivated by thrill-seeking and risk-taking tells us they are not motivated by the time increase of prison time. Their focus is their motivation.

1
PrepTests ·
PT128.S3.Q18
User Avatar
Reneloveslsat
Saturday, Jan 10

@Holly Shulman This is such a great explanation!

1
PrepTests ·
PT131.S1.Q20
User Avatar
Reneloveslsat
Monday, Jan 05

I am writing a similar argument to help me understand this. This is not accurate at all.

Only cajuns eat crawfish. Thus, Kayla must not count as a cajun, since she doesn't eat crawfish.

crawfish eat > cajun

not crawfish eat

not a cajun

1
User Avatar
Reneloveslsat
Friday, Jan 02

I would love to join virtually

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?