Hi, I wanted to say don’t be discouraged taking the test multiple times. I have taken the test a total of three times. My first score was a 145 I was working full time and doing school full time and I wasn’t focused. The second time I was sick and scored a 146. My third score was a 151 and I have been admitted to multiple law schools. During PTs, I would score in the mid 150s what helped me the last time was learning what kind of learning style helped me most ( I graduated early from college and had two months to lock in). But I learned the best time for me to study was the morning, and 1 hour wasn’t enough for me I would study for minimum two hours with breaks of course, and I found study partners that would force me to be accountable. For LR, I would drill the questions I would get wrong on 7 sage from PTs. 20 Questions a day unlimited time and then I would try to add time and see if I actually knew the information or was time was stressing me out ( I have testing anxiety so a lot of the time that was it) or I just didn’t know the material. For RC, my strategy a passage a day keeps you out of the 140s. All of the answers are in the passage you just have to get through the tricks they throw at you so repetition is key. Also if you get a question wrong try to review it and see if you can get to the right answer but if your confused watch JY video explanation eventually he will be plugged in your head and you will think like him. I hope this helps you can do this!

@Berryanalytical The argument is saying that if there is an increase in robbery time in jail, then it will not effect in stopping people from committing robbery. We need to find a answer choice that does not strength. With except questions there will be four choices that strength and one that does not. A would strengthen the argument because if they are motivated by thrill-seeking and risk-taking tells us they are not motivated by the time increase of prison time. Their focus is their motivation.

@HollyShulman This is such a great explanation!

I am writing a similar argument to help me understand this. This is not accurate at all.

Only cajuns eat crawfish. Thus, Kayla must not count as a cajun, since she doesn't eat crawfish.

crawfish eat > cajun

not crawfish eat

not a cajun

I would love to join virtually