User Avatar
RobertTrovato
Joined
Feb 2026
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 165
CAS GPA
3.45
1L START YEAR
2027

Applications

Albany
In process
American
In process
Boston College
In process
Boston University
In process
Brooklyn
In process
Cincinnati
In process
Drexel
In process
Duquesne
In process
Fordham
In process
George Mason
In process
Georgetown
In process
George Washington
In process
Hofstra
In process
Indiana Bloomington
In process
Kentucky
In process
Louisville
In process
Maine
In process
Maryland
In process
Michigan State
In process
New England - Boston
In process
New Hampshire
In process
New York Law School
In process
Northeastern
In process
Notre Dame
In process
Pace
In process
Penn State
In process
Pittsburgh
In process
Quinnipiac
In process
Richmond
In process
Rutgers
In process
Seton Hall
In process
St. John's
In process
Suffolk
In process
Syracuse University
In process
Temple University
In process
Tennessee
In process
UCONN
In process
Vermont
In process
Villanova
In process
Wake Forest
In process
Washington & Lee
In process
William & Mary
In process

Discussions

User Avatar
RobertTrovato
Monday, Feb 23

Why can't you dodge the idea of embedded conditionals entirely on the first question. 'unless' is group 3. Our elements are DP (drive out poachers) and /RPWP (none of the relocated pandas will prosper). So using the translation rule, you get either /DP -> /RPWP or RPWP -> DP. Why do you need to confuse yourself further by introducing an embedded conditional when you don't need one?

4

Confirm action

Are you sure?