For question #5, I had the following: Context: The restaurants on the main block are all temporarily storing their food waste in their backyards. Premise: Since none of them have devised a suitable recycling or disposal plan Sub-Conclusion: this is not a sustainable, long term solution Conclusion: they should stop producing food waste and shut down operations immediately
May someone please tell me if what’s being identified as a premise in this exercise may also serve as a sub-conclusion? Reason being, the way I parceled out this argument was that ‘since none of them devised a suitable recycling or disposal plan, this isn’t a sustainable, long-term solution; therefore, they should stop producing food waste and shut down operations immediately’.
4
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
For question #5, I had the following: Context: The restaurants on the main block are all temporarily storing their food waste in their backyards. Premise: Since none of them have devised a suitable recycling or disposal plan Sub-Conclusion: this is not a sustainable, long term solution Conclusion: they should stop producing food waste and shut down operations immediately
May someone please tell me if what’s being identified as a premise in this exercise may also serve as a sub-conclusion? Reason being, the way I parceled out this argument was that ‘since none of them devised a suitable recycling or disposal plan, this isn’t a sustainable, long-term solution; therefore, they should stop producing food waste and shut down operations immediately’.