Answer Choice (A) asserting that a lack of evidence against a view is proof that the view is correct.

Descriptively inaccurate.

A lack of evidence for the courthouse is not the same as a lack of evidence against the shoe factory.

The argument focuses on a lack of evidence for the courthouse, not on a lack of evidence against the shoe factory.

Hi King Roseyyy,

I will attempt to explain simply.

(C): Most coffeehouses that are well designed feature artwork.

This answer choice may seem tempting because the rule states that:

WD –m→ FA (most well-designed public places feature artwork).

But, how do we know that most well-designed things consist of coffeehouses?

All we know is that coffeehouses are public places. There are so many other kinds of public places: restaurants, for example.

For all we know, most well-designed things that feature artwork could all be restaurants, not coffeehouses.

In other words, the rule WD -m--> FA tells us that most well-designed public places feature artwork, but it's not stated that this majority is made up of coffeehouses.

I hope this helped!

Hi sidhant9101,

Thank you for the explanation, it definitely helped!

"If M is adopted, then N and O are adopted."

Why is each necessary condition (N is adopted and O is adopted) independent of each other?

#help