Q2: He maps the first sentence as a conditional claim (Gods of Mt O -> Watch Olympics). But isn't that just membership in a set? Bc to map it that way implies the contrapositive is true, and I dont think that holds based on the sentence (/Watch Olympics -> /Gods of Mt O). What am I missing here?

@ImanMozaffarian "Necessity does not imply the condition at hand is limited to the sufficient claim." This is very helpful and answers exactly what I came here to ask.

Q2. Not sure exactly how much it matters, but should "his asking the police to investigate" be considered conclusion or premise? Because it is communicating to us that he asked the police, something we didn't know before.