@OmarKhayat also only read the argument how it is never being outside information, just whatever is said and if it is reasonable to conclude something.

@OmarKhayat I think it is because they just conducted an analysis, they found nothing, so basically there is nothing in that statement to prove the first part of the statement which would’ve been the conclusion. It just states a general fact. If you understand basketball it would be like saying Michael Jordan is the greatest of all time. Basketball analysts have conducted deep analysis. Nothing in my second statement helps make the Jordan being the GOAT more true.