- Joined
- Nov 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
@SlippinJimmy2026 I kind of get what you're saying but not entirely. But thank you!
I'm so confused. if it's impossible to tell whether someone's action is moral, then how is the intention of an action indispensable for an evaluation of its morality?
Really not understanding this one :( the video confused me even more. The diagram to me reads without a flaw.
Excellent pollination -> presence of bees
excellent pollination ->abundant fruits and veg
...
/homegrown honey -> /beehives (no presence of bees)-> /excellent pollination
This reads as a perfect contrapositive to me?
me when i get this wrong because i thought the word hasten meant the opposite (and also this section is eliminating me lol)
This section is destroying me... for this question (the only one i got right in this section lmaooo), I stripped the stimulus to: Novel is B because it's C but that's unfair because it's A.
And for answer E, I read that as: novel that A does not have to be B to be C.
Idk if that's going to help anyone but it is helping my brainrot mind to understand this lol
@arieatsoranges I think it's because of the necessary condition (only if). So,
Uniform speed implemented --> roadways have roughly equal average speeds
To me, this reads backwards. We want the outcome to be uniform speeds implemented. (I think, lol idk)
Also, I thought about it without lawgic and to me, the premise doesn't say the average speed IS 75mph. It says that it TENDS to be 75mph. So, that was another reason why I thought C was wrong. Sorry if this is convoluted. I hope it helped somehow!
I didn't choose A specifically because of the "nonmigratory" and "wintering bird" wording... I chose B because of the phrase "field observations indicated that northern cardinals were quite common there." -- if field observations are hindered by the fact that the birds are very easy to spot because they are red, meaning that there isn't even an increase of them. Kind of confused on how A is right.