i dont get it, isnt "any" extreme? what if we could reduce the rate of traffic by some illogical way, like making the law that you cant have pets? should it still be implemented? e feels too broad
The conclusion that was reached was to reduce traffic accidents, which is supported by raising the speed limit to 75, which has nothing to do with uniform traffic rules to all roadways; ughhh looked completely over that first sentence...
I accept E as the answer. However, for my enrichment, how does it support the idea that the measures should be implemented universally? Does it lie within its over-inclusiveness? To me, all E says is to implement rules, but universally? Is it an assumption we have to make?
was having a hard time finding the assumption in this one but realized that that meant I probably already assumed it. that's what led me to E!
There were no gaps in the language anywhere else - everything else seemed straightforward. We of course are programmed to think that we should do anything to reduce accidents, but that is still an assumption.
Misread the last sentence in the stimulus where it said the law should apply to all roads... I read all high-speed roads and immediately chose A. Once I re-read just a bit slower I got the right answer. Rookie mistake!
#help Still a tad bit confused why A isn't right. To me, the stimulus says "all such roadways" which seemed to be referencing the high-speed level, straight stretches of road only. Am I misunderstanding that?
Chose B when I was trying to complete it in under a minute. Chose E during blind review. Realized B doesn't do anything to bridge the gap, while E does. That was a tricky one.
#feedback For this video and many others we are unable to pause the video without the screen going blank which results in a lot of unnecessary rewinding to see things again.
I keep doubting myself on the blind review, especially with PSA questions, and changing my answer from the correct one to a wrong one. Any advice on how to fix this?
I picked B because the study suggested that 75 is the average speed, and the conclusion extrapolated that to say we should apply it uniformly to all highways, where I figured the assumption is that the "average" speed should be evenly applied to "all" highways. But I definitely overlooked E entirely because I thought it was too broad, but now I see completely allows the reasoning to logically work.
#help sighh... Guys I'm really struggling with PSAr question types. I understand the "rule and applications" thing, and I know the 4 levels of indicators for necessary and sufficient indicators, however I am not quite sure I grasp how I am supposed to approach PSAr question types. I end up with two options left and always pick the wrong one. Ik we should be looking for a rule where the premises in the stimulus triggers it, but I keep getting it wrong. Maybe I'm not approaching them properly? Idk, I'm soo confused and frustrated, please SOMEBODY lmk if I'm missing something, or a way to approach these questions.
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
113 comments
i dont get it, isnt "any" extreme? what if we could reduce the rate of traffic by some illogical way, like making the law that you cant have pets? should it still be implemented? e feels too broad
The phrase is "beside the point" not besides
ugh changed from E to C, i was contemplating the obviousness with E
Sorta interesting that this a level 4 question but that the 75th percentile is so high (180).
The conclusion that was reached was to reduce traffic accidents, which is supported by raising the speed limit to 75, which has nothing to do with uniform traffic rules to all roadways; ughhh looked completely over that first sentence...
I accept E as the answer. However, for my enrichment, how does it support the idea that the measures should be implemented universally? Does it lie within its over-inclusiveness? To me, all E says is to implement rules, but universally? Is it an assumption we have to make?
was having a hard time finding the assumption in this one but realized that that meant I probably already assumed it. that's what led me to E!
There were no gaps in the language anywhere else - everything else seemed straightforward. We of course are programmed to think that we should do anything to reduce accidents, but that is still an assumption.
Misread the last sentence in the stimulus where it said the law should apply to all roads... I read all high-speed roads and immediately chose A. Once I re-read just a bit slower I got the right answer. Rookie mistake!
Was feeling so confident and quickly got humbled rip
bro i don't think this is about logic
i knew it was E immediately but thought it eas too simple and went with B
#help Still a tad bit confused why A isn't right. To me, the stimulus says "all such roadways" which seemed to be referencing the high-speed level, straight stretches of road only. Am I misunderstanding that?
Chose B when I was trying to complete it in under a minute. Chose E during blind review. Realized B doesn't do anything to bridge the gap, while E does. That was a tricky one.
I got this wrong and got C
#feedback For this video and many others we are unable to pause the video without the screen going blank which results in a lot of unnecessary rewinding to see things again.
#help So if an answer chose uses limiting language [only], it should automatically be eliminated?
I keep doubting myself on the blind review, especially with PSA questions, and changing my answer from the correct one to a wrong one. Any advice on how to fix this?
I picked B because the study suggested that 75 is the average speed, and the conclusion extrapolated that to say we should apply it uniformly to all highways, where I figured the assumption is that the "average" speed should be evenly applied to "all" highways. But I definitely overlooked E entirely because I thought it was too broad, but now I see completely allows the reasoning to logically work.
#help sighh... Guys I'm really struggling with PSAr question types. I understand the "rule and applications" thing, and I know the 4 levels of indicators for necessary and sufficient indicators, however I am not quite sure I grasp how I am supposed to approach PSAr question types. I end up with two options left and always pick the wrong one. Ik we should be looking for a rule where the premises in the stimulus triggers it, but I keep getting it wrong. Maybe I'm not approaching them properly? Idk, I'm soo confused and frustrated, please SOMEBODY lmk if I'm missing something, or a way to approach these questions.
I keep getting down to two answers and picking the wrong one.... lord HELP ME
dang got all of em right until this one heat check
I am clearly not understanding sufficient and necessary. I keep getting these types of questions wrong
#feedback bring back the let's review summary sections
Heat check...
#help