Hi,
I am wondering if anyone has any good suggestions for specific drill templates that can be effective similar to the 15 LR in 15 min template J.Y. suggested in the core curriculum.
Thanks!
one thing i like to do when the answers are "takes for granted" or "fails to consider" ones is treating them like a necessary assumption or weakening question. if the answer is a takes for granted statement, treating it like a necessary assumption answer is helpful because if that assumption is negated and the argument falls apart, that answer has to be correct because the argument is assuming that. if the answer is a fails to consider statement, that statement if correct would weaken the argument so you can thus just treat it like a weaken question answer. hope this helps!
where can we find content to help us know what we should do to prepare the week leading up to the exam? I am not sure if this study plan feature will be fully available by the time I take my exam.
maybe making mindmaps or things or that nature to map your thoughts could be good? there is examples in some of the core curriculum of this
Hi,
I am wondering if anyone has any good suggestions for specific drill templates that can be effective similar to the 15 LR in 15 min template J.Y. suggested in the core curriculum.
Thanks!
@lawstudent0109 kind of yeah, its useful to do this approach for establishing the descriptive accuracy condition of takes for granted/incorrectly assumed answers, because if that statement is a necessary assumption for the argument to hold up (despite the fact that this cant actually be assumed), then we know that answer is descriptively accurate and therefore correct.