36% success for this question but only 1:17 long explanatory video! Kevin or JY, could you please upload a more explanatory and in-depth video on how to approach this answer and how to avoid wrong answers?

#help #feedback

@ezrathevarasalingam256 my goat

@Elijah_Mize Reading the AC, I diagrammed E like this: E says /VBHR -> MPF + WDF +PASS SOON. How/why were you able to write E's diagram like [WFD + MPF + /VHR] --> Passed into Law?

With AC D, is it not true that Stones' data is based on contradictory data? #help

Can someone please explain how D supports the link between [emergence within ancient greek civilization of the individual] and [perceived personal autonomy in greek society]? how can we deduce validly that because there was an emergence of the free agent, personal autonomy was perceived? or am i thinking too deep post logic section...

@AlizaGGG that's what i did, so i am also curious..

@Charles_ I think what is confusing you is that the claim you have identified for the argument is that the claim is exaggerated. Rather, the claim is actually--from my understanding, so please correct me anyone if I am wrong--that "a fatal catastrophe is quite unlikely at any stage." The "exaggerates the risk" is a premise that supports his conclusion that the the backup system significantly decreases the chances of a fatal catastrophe. The first two sentences of the argument are the two premises, and the last sentence is the conclusion. By identifying the last sentence as the conclusion (and even by looking at the conclusion alone), we understand why the arguer thinks that the leading critic is wrong for saying that sending explorers with current technology is a bad idea. The conclusion itself also highlights the prime flaw is parts to a whole (by relying on the idea that every stage is backed up will mean that the entire journey as a whole is safe). I hope this helps!

#feedback I really want to see what the priority levels and difficulty levels of the lesson plan videos are, just as we see it for you try.