SunnyD
- Joined
- Dec 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Full-time legal assistant by day; full-time 7Sage nerd by night.
Admissions profile
LSAT
172
CAS GPA
4.0
1L START YEAR
2027
@evb010724 Process of elimination is great for speeding up parallel flaw. For this question, there are some quick eliminations you can make.
-- This is not the same as the first premise of the stimulus at all. Linda says that from her 'insider knowledge' as a scientist, she knows something about how scientists are. An equivalent for (A) would be Ralph, as an expert in biology, making an observation about experts in biology. Instead, he says something about marsupials. Don't read the rest. Skip.
-- Same issue as A. The parallel would be if Yuri made an observation about wine connoisseurs. He does not. Skip.
-- Same issue. The parallel would be if Xi made an observation about experienced photographers. Skip.
This should make the first three really quick to eliminate. Then you look at (B) and (E) more closely. We know the first sentence/premise is a match, so now just look at the second. The stimulus says: Since most A are B, at least some C are not B.
-- This is a match! You pick it and can move on, or you can check (E) too.
-- NOT a match. For it to be a match, it should say "some people who like to pay taxes are NOT honest people"
TLDR: To go quicker on parallel flaw, eliminate as many options as you can without reading the full answer choices.