@aviinatt Yes - I remained confused until this explanation. Thank you! I understand the correlation, I understood the argument to dismantle, but I am having a hard time with the answer choices. I interpreted A if people who are genetically more likely have the same iron as people who don't, then iron is neutral at best. But I get now we're saying A wins because we're removing one possible alternative and that is good enough to strengthen.

Okay WTH. I am struggling with these, but it took me about 5 seconds to realize that Pat was not part of the special club. That's the only way Pat could have broken the rules. Dying at this being a level 5. Sometimes I feel so smart. Then I feel so dumb. Thanks LSAT.