The video is blank for me, I would love to watch it. Could anyone help me?

As a very logical thinker, this lesson was very helpful. It defined concessions, points offered in concession, premise(s), context and addressed that not all context is the same. 10/10 lesson

I think I’m grasping this lesson, to be put into simpler words, the weaker the assumption, the more vulnerable it is to affective criticism. Just saying “criticism” doesn’t seem to match the lesson, since either way an sssumption opens the door to criticism, it’s just the validity or not. In terms of the law, would the assumption made allow deaths opposing side to open the gate to reasonable doubt or would their argument be crazy?

@isabellagirjikian I’m wondering the same thing

I believe the Disney Argument is the strongest due to the irrefutable support it offers. Meaning, anytime I would consider, hm but what about this flaw? It would refute it with more support. Until finally offering the conclusion.

Once I decided the “strongest,” I considered Trash Bin Vs. Tiger Argument. This is where I determined the Trash Bin argument felt very “persuasive” and “believe me because I’m a detective,” which an earlier lesson told us a persuasive argument does not equal a strong argument whereas I felt the Tiger argument was stronger though shorter.

Thats my hypothesis.