This is aweseome.

Can I get a link to try pls?

Isn't E saying, okay fine it was a speaking staff but it sympbolizes a a warrior's mace. It was not just a head of speaking staff,, a communal object passed around a small assembly to indicate who has the right to speak. If it sympbolizes a a warrior's mace, not passed around a small assembly to indicate who has the right to speak, does it not undermine the conclusion? I am confused.

I see why B could be right or is right but I am still not convinced why E is wrong?

I liked E first but I the word resolution got me. I was just overthinking it. I thought explanation does not necessarily eequate resolution.

That is awesome. Congrates.

Awesome. Thank you!

@elbicho I agree. i think the problem with B is that it talks about other contaminants. We just don't care about it.

Thank you for sharing! Congratulations!

@ZahidAli ah answering my own concern here. This is MSS, not MBT. So the answer choice A has some support.

Not sure if A is still making sense to me. We know that starting cattle ranching → a large herd of cows, one bull, and two acres per cow.

And starting ostrich farming → two pairs of yearling ostriches and one acre.

All we know from the above facts are the starting costs. How can we infer that two pairs of yearling ostriches are more expensive than a herd of cows and a bull? What if starting costs include something else, like the salaries of the people working to build the farm?

Ah I missed the word only. NVM

I was between A and E, but where does Jessica say that there are not better ways? I am a bit confused with E.

I love this written explanation. I wonder if 7sage is planning on doing this for all questions.

J.Y explanations are great too! thanks

Made the same mistake. Just googled. it:

"The 18th century was the century from 1701 to 1800. Centuries: 17th century."

Thank you!

For how long have you been studying? If you are interested to study togather sometime, please do reach out at zahidsajidi09@gmail.com.

D got me extremely confused. I think it was because it was a bit convulted for me to understand it. Nonethless, it was a good excercise of a question that gave me trouble.

I am still confused. While the author does mention grapes that could reduce premature heart disease, the author doesn't say anything about plums or apples.

This was really hard:(

I am a horrible reader, but getting 3 questions wrong makes me feel good about it LOL

Thanks !!!

This was just blowing my mind